No review yet
1989
0
View all photos
(1)
Daniel Roth is a watchmaking house founded in 1988 in the Vallée de Joux (Le Sentier, Switzerland) by the eponymous master watchmaker. Heir to a classical chronometry culture that he helped reinterpret, Daniel Roth established an immediately identifiable vocabulary: the double-ellipse case, finely engine-turned dials, slender hands, and legible complications. After an independent first chapter and a later industrial integration, the brand has, since 2023, returned to very limited production focused on top-tier hand finishing and continuity of its original design.
The brand’s formal signature is its so-called double-ellipse case, historically linked to the Ellipsocurvex name: a shape between round and rectangular whose lines hug the wrist and make the watch instantly recognizable; this geometry delivers refined presence without ostentation. The philosophy goes with deliberately sober legibility: slim hands, fine minute tracks, balanced applied numerals, and even guilloché that structures the dial’s surface. The result evokes classic watchmaking reinterpreted with more visual architecture and depth of display. Casebacks are often solid on the most traditional pieces to preserve the atelier spirit, while other references opt for sapphire backs to showcase finishing.
This aesthetic, more instrumental than demonstrative, favors the balance between elegance and daily use: the oval-rectangular format allows contained thickness and harmonious proportions, while straight lugs ensure a stable stance on leather straps. The effect appeals both to dress-watch wearers and to collectors sensitive to historical codes.
From the outset, Daniel Roth stood out with poetic, legible complications: tourbillons, calendars, retrograde displays, and the famed “Papillon” combining jumping hours with fan-shaped minutes; form is in the service of display, never the other way around. These themes were executed in short runs, often in precious metals, where finishing quality—anglage, striping, straight graining—plays a central role.
Over the decades, these families have seen multiple interpretations depending on the brand’s governance, with variations in size, decoration, and movements; the through-line remains clear reading within a highly codified formal frame.
The first period (late 1980s to mid-1990s) reflects the founder’s direct imprint: a tightly coherent vocabulary and small-quantity runs. These “first-manner” pieces attract today’s collectors for their stylistic purity. The brand then changed ownership and was, around the early 2000s, integrated into a jewelry group, opening a parenthesis where the offering broadened and some aesthetic codes evolved. Volumes remained modest, but coherence varied across lines.
Since 2023, Daniel Roth has returned to an atelier-like stance: production stated to be below one hundred pieces per year, a refocus on the double ellipse, very high-level hand finishing, and emblematic complications (notably the tourbillon). This revival embraces scarcity rather than diffusion, with a narrative emphasizing fidelity to the original design and the permanence of traditional finishing.
Beyond the case shape, value is read in the details: regularity of the guilloché, cleanliness of the bevels, chamfered jewel sinks, polished screw heads, bridge symmetry, and coherence of dial openings; execution quality takes precedence over ostentation. Tourbillons and chiming watches require specialized maintenance; on simpler pieces (hours-minutes, small seconds, GMT), stable timekeeping mostly depends on sound regulation and respect of service intervals. Historical series often feature very fine clous-de-Paris or grained dials; recent re-issues reproduce these textures with heightened rigor.
Movements vary by era and complication, from reworked proven bases to specific developments for the most ambitious pieces. What matters on the wrist is the coherence between calibre architecture and dial: a legible complication, airy layout, and a case cut that does not compromise ergonomics. Enthusiasts value sufficient power reserve for regular wear and user-friendly function setting (GMT, calendar).
The brand targets connoisseurs seeking a dress watch with singular personality, high-tier finishing, and very small quantities. Contemporary pieces command high prices (often six figures for major complications), while historical watches span a wider spectrum depending on condition, completeness, and period. Channels remain selective (restricted distribution, direct relationships), and some references come only in limited series. The secondary market reflects this interest: “first-manner” pieces and major complications enjoy sustained demand, while later models are best assessed case by case.
Note that public price information is at times fragmentary; when not communicated by the brand, it must be inferred from auction results and condition-based comparisons. In doubt, prioritize intrinsic quality (dial, hands, finishing) over a reference chase. Original warranties and documented service histories bring a decisive qualitative premium in this niche universe.
Start with intended use: daily dress watch, occasion piece, or the keystone of a collection devoted to classical displays; the double ellipse is surprisingly versatile for average wrists. For historical references, prefer intact dials (crisp guilloché, no oxidation), coherent hands, and minimally polished cases (sharp edges and stepped bezels). For recent creations, focus on the match between complication and wear: a daily tourbillon does not have the same constraints as a jumping-hour or a GMT.
If you hesitate between a “first-manner” piece and a recent realization, remember the former speaks to authenticity and founding style, while the latter offers today’s top finishing standards. The choice is between historical aura and modern perfection.
Daniel Roth addresses enthusiasts who want a dress watch with instantly readable personality, built around a double-ellipse case and magnified classical displays. The brand’s identity rests on dial clarity, disciplined proportions, and a finishing standard rarely compromised. To choose between tourbillon, Papillon, GMT, or three-handers, start from intended use and everyday legibility, then scrutinize execution quality in detail. Production period, condition, and aesthetic coherence matter more than rarity alone. To refine your decision, rely on Dialicious customer reviews: they illuminate on-wrist experience that spec sheets cannot capture.
(Updated September 2025)
The order of partners is random and does not assume available stocks or sales prices of watches. Dialicious and Achille SAS are in no way responsible for the services of these partners but may potentially be paid by them to be displayed on this page.
The order of partners is random. Dialicious and Achille SAS are in no way responsible for the services of these partners, but may potentially be paid by them to be featured on this page.
No principal picture uploaded yet
Breitling
4.4
59 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Oris
4.2
57 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Bell & Ross
4.2
32 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Lip
4.0
77 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Grand Seiko
4.5
59 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Tudor
4.5
179 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Cartier
4.3
44 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Hamilton
4.2
57 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Citizen
4.3
97 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Mido
4.4
28 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
TAG Heuer
4.3
51 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Baltic
4.1
55 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Orient
4.1
43 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Charlie Paris
4.3
31 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Zenith
4.4
64 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Nomos Glashütte
4.4
30 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Yema
4.2
113 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
G-SHOCK
4.5
51 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Jaeger-LeCoultre
4.3
40 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
ZRC
4.4
32 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Rolex
4.5
255 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Swatch
3.7
59 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Serica
4.6
60 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Raketa
4.2
36 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Omega
4.4
280 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Seiko
4.2
283 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
BND
4.5
29 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Casio
4.2
36 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Tissot
4.1
104 Reviews
No principal picture uploaded yet
Longines
4.3
84 Reviews
You own a Daniel Roth ?
Take the opportunity to be the 1st to review this watch